Tuesday, February 21, 2012

Week 5 reflections


When I first started this course, I was thinking “Oh great!”  “We are going to discuss some leading researchers in the field of education and they have no clue about the kids in my school, but they will tell us this works and that works.”
Then I get my week one assignment and start reading Leading with Passion and Knowledge by Nancy Fichtman Dana.  I start thinking why in the world have we, schools, not been using this philosophy?  Asking questions, collecting data, analyzing data, and making changes based on their findings to better “our own” students/staff.  This makes sense.  I think the biggest impact for week one was the fact that administrators are doing their own research on their campus and making the necessary changes so that the students and staff are always challenged and successful at school.  Dana states that action research is so beneficial because theories and knowledge are generated from research grounded in the realities of educational practice, practitioners investigate their own problems and practitioners play a part in the research process, which makes them more likely to facilitate change based on the knowledge they generate.  For week one the most intriguing point was that principals and school districts are starting to conduct their own action research plans instead of relying on “outside” researchers.
Week two was very interesting as well.  We were able to listen to three different administrators from three different districts that have been using action research on their campus or in their district.  Even though each administrator used action research for different reasons there was a common theme amongst them.  Each one of them stated that action research was done to increase student success in their school or in their district.  It was all about the students.  For our reading this week we moved on to Chapter 2 in Leading with Passion and Knowledge.  This chapter covered the first step in the action research plan:  finding a wondering.  Dana gave us nine areas where we may find our first wondering.  The area that I focused on the most was curriculum development.   Newberry Elementary School principal had a great plan for developing writing.  Her goal was to increase writing in her school.  Her plan involved many people in the school.  She provided professional development about the teaching of writing.  Her school collaborated across grade levels so the curriculum would stair step from one grade level to the next.  She wanted the writing to be aligned with ideas from leading experts.  I think the most important part of her plan was including multiple grade levels and using ideas from multiple experts.  Often we get consumed by one philosophy and tend to only do that philosophy.  She was very smart taking different ideas from different writing experts and making a plan for her school.  Once again it goes back to making the action research relevant to your campus.

For week 3 we were able to create a plan for our action research project.  The first thing we needed to do was create a wondering.  The phrases that were given to us in the Dana text were great starters:  “I wonder…….,”   “I think…..,” and “What if……”  I had talked to our campus math coach and our campus language arts coach.  Our campus language arts coach wanted some data on our tutoring program.  The past few years we have done a few different things.  Three years ago teachers taught tutoring.  Last year we hired a tutoring teacher to pull groups during the day and let teachers teach tutoring.  This year teachers are teaching tutoring and they created their own groups and own schedule.  So our goal was to collect data to see how effective out tutoring program is twice a week for the students who scored below level on our reading benchmark in October/November. The interesting part is each grade level is tutoring at different times, using different strategies, some are using incentives, and some have mixed groups and some kept their own students.  So we are hoping we can collect some data so we can make our tutoring program more structured in the future.
During week 4 we discussed the force field analysis, the Delphi method, and the nominal group technique for sustaining improvement for the future.  These strategies came from the Examining What We Do To Improve Our Schools by Harris, Edmonson, and Combs.  I thought all three strategies had valid points.  I like the force field analysis because it looks at the pros/cons of the action plans and creates a plan that addresses the cons.  I liked the nominal group technique because it takes place with small groups.  However, my favorite is the Delphi method.  I really liked the Delphi method because it consists of a panel of people who would be affected by the change.  It also provides confidentiality, so I feel people would express their concerns/needs more openly.   I like reproducing everyone’s comments, sending it back out to create a synthesized list, and then ranking everyone’s comments/concerns in order to narrow down our ideas to form a consensus.  The Care Model was another example for sustaining improvement.  I like that it focused on good things we are doing now, but it also focuses on identifying future concerns. 

So far this course has had the biggest impact because the research plan is RELEVANT to our campus/students.  We are the researchers.  We create the wondering.  We collect the data and we make the appropriate changes.

References:
Dana, Fichtman Nancy. (2009). Leading with Passion and Knowledge.  The Principal as Action Researcher.  Thousands Oaks, CA: Corwin.
Harris, Sandra, Edmonson, Stacey, Combs, Julie.  (2010).  Examining What We Do To Improve Our Schools.  8 Steps From Analysis to Action.  Larchmount, NY: Eye on Education.   

Tuesday, February 14, 2012

Week 4

We read about 3 new strategies to support and sustain action research.  I am finding each week that reflecting on the best practices is a very common theme.  I think the reflecting questions at the end of each strategy were great for guiding questions.  Also, the more and more I look at my research plan the more questions I ask myself.  For instance, this week I asked the tutoring teachers if they used any incentives during tutoring.  3 out of 9 teachers use incentives to motivate students during tutoring.  So, will the use of incentives motivate students while they are in tutoring.  This is just one more factor I will look at when I send a survey to the students after tutoring is completed.  I liked the Force Field Analysis because it help you create a pro and con checklist and you create a strategy based on those pro's/con's.  The Delphi method seemed like it allowed for open communication because most responses were confidential but it also seemed like a lot of sitting at the computer for long hours.  I am learning more and more about action research.  This class is great.

Tuesday, February 7, 2012

Action Planning Template


Action Planning Template
Goal: Our goal is to offer tutoring to students who scored below standard on our October/November reading benchmark in an effort to help them score above standard on the next benchmark in April and ultimately the STARR test in May.
Action Steps(s):
Person(s) Responsible:
Timeline: Start/End
Needed Resources
Evaluation

Tutoring after school based on concepts/strategies






5th grade
Jan, 2012-May, 2012
5th grade teachers
*Reading benchmark Feb. 27th
STARR- March 28th
Tutoring before or after school- keeping their own students
4th grade
Feb., 2012-
May 2012
4th grade teachers
*Reading benchmark Feb. 29th
STARR- April 25th
Tutoring before school with ESL students using specific concepts/strategies
Tamie Fons- Head ESL campus teacher
Jan.,2012-May, 2012
ESL teacher
Depends on grade level
Tutoring before school, keeping their own children, using specific concepts/strategies for tutoring







*denotes change from original dates
3rd grade
Jan., 2012-May 2012
3rd grade teachers
*Reading benchmark March 1st
STARR-April 25th
Week 3
I am really liking the structure of this action research plan/inquiry.  To me the Tool 7.1 Action Planning Template was very organized.  It seemed easy to state your goal, action steps, person(s) responsible, timeline, needed resources, and evaluation.  I like it because this can be an easy accountability/reflection chart along the way.  We can always go back to this template,check it, and make sure we are following our plan.  I also like this template because it allows us to make changes along the way.  With our action steps written down, we can reflect upon our next evaluations and ask ourselves, "Are our action steps working or do they need to be changed?"
The readings this week have been great.  I am finding myself writing notes everywhere, wanting to share them with our principal.  The readings have offered great common sense ideas for our plan/inquiry project.

The one aspect of this project/plan, I find crucial is the ability to constantly monitor the progress and make necessary changes based on the data that you have collected along the way.

I think as educators and administrators if we learn to monitor progress along the way then we will always be able to make changes to our teaching strategies so our students feel successful in the classroom and in life.  I really enjoyed our reading this week that discussed the different ways to collect data.  We need to be able to look at the data during the process and make changes accordingly.  

Monday, January 30, 2012

Week 2

I conferenced with my site supervisor and we decided to do my action research based on after school tutoring.  Our question:  Will our after school tutoring help increase our benchmark scores for those students who scored below standard on our October reading benchmark?  We are hoping to see an increase in scores.  If we see increases, I would like to conference with the tutoring teachers and discuss what strategies were used during tutoring that they felt were effective in increasing benchmark scores.  If we see increases, I am hoping we can model future tutoring sessions after the current tutoring sessions.   

Tuesday, January 24, 2012

How can educational leaders use blogs effectively??

I thinking blogging is a very useful tools for educational leaders.  For instance, it is a great place to write your thoughts/express ideas pertaining to your school.  If you are doing any action research inquiries, you can post questions/concerns.  Blogging is a great tool for feedback.  Educational leaders from across the world can give you feedback about anything that may need to be addressed with your school or curriculum.  If you work together with other principals you can share ideas with each other.  I think the biggest advantage of blogging is the ability to link with educational leaders across the world and share ideas with each other.  

Action Based Inquiry

I hear the word "research" and I turn into a sour grape because most of the research has come from an expert, from a far away land, that has no clue where my kids come from, how my kids learn, or how I teach my students.  So, being a good teacher I take all of this useless information, crumple it, and throw it into the recycling bin and save a few more trees from being cut down.  However, as part of my master's program for educational administration, my second class is research and we are focusing on completing an action based research plan.  As I am reading my articles, I am saying, "This is awesome."  " What a great idea."  " We do this with our leadership teams."  "No wonder we have PLC's at our school."  So why does action based research/inquiry make so much sense to administrators and educators?  One, the problem identified for inquiry is one that you feel needs to be addressed in your classroom or in your school.  Two, you get to create a strategy/plan that will hopefully improve the problem identified in your school/classroom.  Three, you get to collect the data based on pre/post assessments, common assessments, and observations you have made in your classroom.  Four, you get to analyze the data collected for any trends or patterns.  Five, you get to make changes to your teaching strategies, that will help improve student learning.  Six, you get to share your results with your administrators/teachers or if you blog, you can post results on your blog for the entire technological world to find.  To me, the most positive aspect of action based research is the ownership of the plan/inquiry.  You are in charge with some assistance from facilitators.  You get to see what is working and what isn't working.  Action based research is an outstanding way to reflect on your teaching strategies in order for your students to be successful in your class or in your school.